Overall aim:
A more critical engagement with ideas around the purposes of curriculum and curriculum design in a religion and worldviews approach. Presenting practical examples and the work of current thinkers in the field of curriculum.
Content
1: Recap: what is curriculum?
Short video to recap the introduction to curriculum course.
2: What is the purpose behind a curriculum?
Consideration of brief accounts from Richard Kueh, Tim Oates, Gillian Georgiou and Kathryn Wright, Michael Oakeshott and Amanda Spielman on the purpose of a curriculum.
3: What is a multidisciplinary curriculum?
Oakeshott’s ideal of a ‘conversation between the generations’. What is a subject discipline, what disciplines do we employ in RE?
Practical example: REsearchers by Giles and Rob Freathy et al.
4: A disciplinary curriculum in a whole-school context
Potential problems with an overly rational approach to knowledge, using philosopher of education Jane Roland Martin.
Consider wider aims of the RE curriculum over time: SMSC, British Values, community cohesion.
Related to Ofsted.
5: Knowledge in a multidisciplinary religion and worldviews curriculum
Types of knowledge: personal, substantive and disciplinary. Being scholarly- what does it mean?
3 short extracts of scholarly sources of subject knowledge on Buddhism, Christianity and Judaism.
What does ‘collectively enough’ on the curriculum mean?
6: Assessment and curriculum design
Using Summer Turner, models of curriculum design and what these mean for assessment: ED Hirsch, Michael Young, Daniel Willingham, Dylan Williams.
Wat does this mean for a religion and worldviews approach to curriculum?
7: Next steps
References used in this course, further reading and research. True or false quiz to test understanding.
Questions:
What are different purposes of the curriculum in school?
How do we manage competing purposes of the curriculum?
What id disciplinary knowledge? Are the school subjects disciplines?
What disciplines do we employ in RE, why, and what does this look like in the curriculum?
What are dangers and benefits of a knowledge-based curriculum? How is this managed in a religion and worldviews approach?
What are classic models of curriculum design, and how does this influence models of assessment?
What does it mean to be scholarly?